http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=vkpz7xFTWJo
29 November 2012
ALCOHOL LEADS TO CLEAR THINKING ABOUT ALMOST NOTHING
This little video does a great job of explaining the effect of alcohol on one's thinking. You think you are thinking clearly, but there is nothing really coming through; you are actually perceiving less.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=vkpz7xFTWJo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=vkpz7xFTWJo
Chucktown Squash
I am so proud of my son, Sam Candler, and his wife, Lynnie Minkowski Candler, as they serve students in some of the toughest Charleston areas. Here is a great article from the Charleston Post and Courier, about their work. And here is the link to Chucktown Squash. Go team!
Perigree Moon and Apogee Moon
Perigree Moon and Apogee Moon (obviously not this dramatic to the naked eye; it was still bright enough to wake me up last night.)
Astronomy Picture of the Day
Discover the cosmos! Each day a different image or photograph of our fascinating universe is featured, along with a brief explanation written by a professional astronomer.2012 November 29
Image Credit & Copyright: Catalin Paduraru
18 November 2012
HANNAH AND THE HEADLINE NEWS
1 Samuel 1:4-20
This week, newspaper headlines are moving away from the
coverage of a general’s extramarital affair, and moving towards the escalation
of violence in Israel-Palestine. Both the stories are sad, and even tragic.
“How the mighty have fallen!” I might say. How the mighty
have fallen. Like a lot of our ordinary wisdom, and ordinary common sense, this
phrase is actually from the Bible. No matter how devastating or surprising or
tragic is the news from our own day and time, our stories do not top the wisdom
of the stories of the Bible. No matter what the incident, the Bible has seen it
before!
“How the mighty have fallen” (2 Samuel 1:19). It was King
David who first uttered those words, the same King David to whom another David
has been compared this past week. Generation after generation, we watch people who
are high and lifted up, but who nevertheless succumb, almost inevitably, to
some weakness. The Greeks called it hubris,
an overbearing pride that can lead to tragedy. It is part of being human, and
we all share that tendency, in some measure. All of us do -- men and women
alike.
And nations do, too. In a very real way, the same sort of
danger now threatens the very land and people if Israel-Palestine. The more
powerful a country is, the more risk it has of being brought low – if not
literally, then certainly spiritually.
All these headline news stories point me to two truths. The
first is that, ultimately, each of us needs mercy. No matter who we are, we
need mercy. The second truth is this: it is only God who can restore mercy, and
purpose, to our lives.
Today, we have another story. Today’s story from the Bible
is one that we have not heard about in a while, the story of Hannah, the mother
of Samuel. Samuel has been described as priest and prophet and judge and seer –
almost everything. But his story is for another day. It is the story of Hannah
that inspires us today. Her story, too, has all the elements of headline news:
resentment and envy, deep prayer and restoration (which some might call karma),
and even a sense of justice and balance.
Her story, and her song, “The Song of Hannah” ring
throughout both human history and divine history. It starts with emptiness and
sorrow. She cannot bear children, even though her husband, Elkanah, loves her
very much. Elkanah actually had another wife, which, of course, was common in
early Hebrew history. Some have said that the only reason Elkanah took another
wife was so that he could have children and continue his heritage. Even though
he had another wife bearing him children, Elkanah loved Hannah deeply, and gave
her a double portion of all that he sacrificed.
The other wife, Peninnah, did not like this. In fact, she
was resentful and downright mean about it. The Bible calls her a rival, saying
that Peninnah “provoked and irritated Hannah, because the Lord had closed her
womb” (1Samuel 1:6). One can imagine the sort of taunting and wicked talk that resentment
might entail. If anonymous e-mails had existed in that time, Peninnah would
have used them! The word for “irritate,” used here, can also mean “thunder,” or
“thunder against.” Peninnah thundered against the barren Hannah.
But Hannah did not give up. Though she wept bitterly and
would not eat, Hannah did pray. In fact, here is a curious thing: She prayed so
earnestly and deeply that she did not use words. Well, she did have words, but
they did not cross her lips. In those days, silent prayer was a bit uncommon, just
as silent reading was.
In our day and time, we tend to take “reading to ourselves”
for granted, and most of us here today know how to read silently. But in the
history of civilization, that is a newer phenomenon. For instance, at the time
of Augustine in the fifth century AD, most people read by saying the words
aloud. Reading silently was unknown.
Apparently, the practice of prayer was similar. One prayed
by saying something aloud. To pray without making a sound was something
different. The priest, Eli, “observed
[Hannah’s] mouth praying silently; only her lips moved, but her voice was not
heard” (1Samuel 1:12-13). Therefore, the priest, Eli, thought she was drunk.
When Hannah replied that she was not drunk, but, instead,
deeply troubled and vexed, then Eli somehow knew the deep sincerity of Hannah’s
prayer. And Eli blessed Hannah: “Go in peace; the God of Israel grant the
petition you have made to him” (1 Samuel 1:17).
I believe that the prayer of Hannah is remarkable for being
a new kind of prayer in civilization, a prayer so sincere and deep that it was
deeper than sound. It was silent and penetrating. God heard her prayer.
Hannah went back to her husband, and she ate and drank with
her husband. (A great lesson: Never ignore the power of prayer and eating and
drinking with your husband! Or your wife!) “In due time, Hannah conceived and
more a son. She named him Samuel…” (1 Samuel 1:20).
It is a beautiful story. But the story continues after the
text assigned to us today. Hannah gives up her son, Samuel, when he is three
years old, to minister with Eli in Shiloh. She gives him up! (though she later
has three sons and two daughters). And then she sings a song. Her song, the
Song of Hannah, is what rings through human history and divine history. It is a
song of how the humble overcome the powerful, and how the poor become rich.
Listen to it:
My heart exults in the LORD;
my strength is exalted in my God.
…3
Talk no more so very proudly,
let not arrogance come from your mouth;
for the LORD is a God of knowledge,
and by him actions are weighed.
4
The bows of the mighty are broken,
but the feeble gird on strength.
5
Those who were full have hired themselves out for bread,
but those who were hungry are fat with
spoil.
The barren has borne seven,
but she who has many children is forlorn.
6
The LORD kills and brings to life;
he brings down to Sheol and raises up.
7
The LORD makes poor and makes rich;
he brings low, he also exalts.
8
He raises up the poor from the dust;
he lifts the needy from the ash heap,
to make them sit with princes
and inherit a seat of honor.
…10
The LORD! His adversaries shall be shattered;
the Most High will thunder in heaven. (1 Samuel 2: 1-10)
“The Most High will thunder in heaven,” Hannah said. I like
that phrase “thunder,” because it is the same word that was used to describe
how Peninnah irritated, or thundered against, Hannah! In the divine reversal of
Godly justice, Peninnah’s thunderings are turned against her. That is the
lesson of the Song of Hannah. God reverses the plight of the humble and the
poor so that they are lifted up and become rich.
That is the original Song of Hannah, the one sung by Hannah
herself. But it only started there. It continued! It got repeated in Psalm 113:
5
Who is like the LORD our God,
who is seated on high,
6
who looks far down
on the heavens and the earth?
7
He raises the poor from the dust,
and lifts the needy from the ash heap,
8
to make them sit with princes,
with the princes of his people.
9
He gives the barren woman a home,
making her the joyous mother of children.
Praise the LORD! (Psalm 113: 5-9)
Now, it is commonly thought that King David himself wrote
Psalm 113, and he certainly knew about divine reversal. He certainly knew both
sides: how the Lord lifts up the lowly, but also how the Lord brings down the
haughty. After Saul had died, and after his best friend, Jonathan had died , it
was David who lamented, “How the mighty have fallen.” In fact, he seems to
lament the actual weapons of war. “How the mighty have fallen, and the weapons
of war perished” (2 Samuel 1:27).
King David lived longer. It is King David’s final speech,
when he was about to die, that might provide for us the summary stanza of this
process of divine reversal. His last words are known as “The Song of David,”
and they are an answer to the age-old question: How does one say what the will
of the Lord is, amidst a world of jealousy and envy, violence and power?
So David sings, to God:
26
With the loyal you show yourself loyal;
with the blameless you show yourself
blameless;
27
with the pure you show yourself pure,
and with the crooked you show yourself
perverse.
28
You deliver a humble people,
but your eyes are upon the haughty to bring
them down. (2 Samuel 22:26-28)
“With the loyal, God shows himself loyal.” Those are
beautiful words.
Almost a thousand years after King David, a legendary book
was written, one which tried to describe where Mary, the mother of Jesus came
from. It is called the Protoevangelium of
James, from the second century A.D. See if it sounds familiar. It says that
Mary’s elderly parents prayed for a child, saying that such a child would then
be “a gift to the Lord my God.” Miraculously, Mary is born, as a response to
faithful prayer. Then Mary, at the age of three, is presented to the priests in
the temple of Jerusalem. Just like Samuel was born and at the age of three was
delivered to the priest!
And who was Mary’s mother, according to this story? The
mother of Mary was Anna, which is the same word as Hannah. The word, “Hannah”
means “grace.” The Song of Hannah, then, means, always, The Song of Grace.
The mother of Mary was named Anna, or Hannah, or Grace. This
is why, later, when she learned she would conceive miraculously, Mary would sing her own song, which would be
still another stanza of Song of Hannah, a song of grace:
Mary said,
My soul magnifies the Lord,
47
and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior,
48
for he has looked with favor on the lowliness of his servant.
Surely, from now on all generations will
call me blessed;
49
for the Mighty One has done great things for me,
and holy is his name.
50
His mercy is for those who fear him
from generation to generation.
51
He has shown strength with his arm;
he has scattered the proud in the thoughts
of their hearts.
52
He has brought down the powerful from their thrones,
and lifted up the lowly;
53
he has filled the hungry with good things,
and sent the rich away empty. (Luke
1:46-53)
We know that song as the Magnificat
today, and we sing it every Sunday at Evensong in this Cathedral. We will sing
it during this upcoming season of Advent; it will be our version of the
headline news. And from it, a Savior will be born.
What will be your song during this next season? What will be
your Song of Hannah, Song of David, Song of Mary, Magnificat, Song of Grace?
Where does your life need reversal? Where does your life
need to be lifted up? And, conversely, where might you need to learn humility?
The song of grace is the same, and it has been throughout
divine history:
“God delivers a humble
people” (2 Samuel 22:28)
“The Lord makes poor
and makes rich,
He brings low, he also
exults.” (1 Samuel 2:7)
AMEN.
The Very Reverend Samuel G. Candler
Dean of the Cathedral of St. Philip
17 November 2012
COMMITTED PEOPLE INTEREST ME
(I originally wrote this article for The Cathedral Times newsletter, 21 October 2012)
To me, the most interesting people are the ones who are
committed to something. Uncommitted people just don’t seem that interesting to
me.
The Pew Research Center presented their latest analysis of
religious affiliation the other day. As expected, the trend that continues is
that people are choosing “None” for their religious affiliation. “The number of
Americans who do not identify with any religion continues to grow at a rapid
pace. One-fifth of the U.S. public – and a third of adults under 30 – are
religiously unaffiliated today, the highest percentages ever in Pew Research
Center polling,” declared their website.
That is fine with me. If people want to be uncommitted, let
them come and go, as they please. Personally, I want people who are committed
to something. This has to do with relationships, it has to do with friendships,
and it even has to do with sports. It has to do with politics, with
investments, with almost everything. Even if you are committed to the sports
team who is my team’s competitor, you are more interesting to me than the uncommitted
person.
Yes, people who are committed are far more interesting to me
than uncommitted ones are.
Committed people risk things. They give things. They give their
attention and their time. They give their money. Yes, it is risky to give those
kinds of things in life; but, commitment is something we pay for in life. We
pay for it, which is to say that sometimes it costs us sadness or conflict.
When we are committed, we are often disappointed, and even betrayed sometimes.
In all these ways, commitment is a lot like love. The love
which is true love, is very costly. But, glory hallelujah, true love is also
worth it. True love lifts me up; it makes me glow. It makes me more
interesting! But, when I love, I am also willing to give up things, to pay for
things, to commit to things.
So, I do not mind if people are spiritual and not religious.
Let them be. But, ultimately, they are not very interesting to me; they float
around like teen-age groupies following whoever is that week’s number one in
the polls.
I am interested in the long term, the love term. To me,
people who risk being committed to something, and to someone, have character;
they have a life. They have a place from which to see the world with steady,
lasting vision; they have love.
I urge you to commit yourself to something this season. Not
just anyone, of course, and not just anything. Commit yourself to someone who
is steady and loving. Commit yourself to someone who can, and will, give you
life. Commit yourself to Jesus.
Where is this Jesus? He is in his body, which is the church
(Colossians 1:24). The Cathedral of St. Philip, and whatever local parish you
are close to right now, needs your commitment this year. Yes, we are a body
that has some blemishes and even some illnesses from time to time. But we are
the Body of Christ, which produces resurrection and new life from those very
wounds. In doing so, we have a message and a gospel for anyone in this life who
has ever been wounded: love wins.
Commit yourself to the Cathedral parish this year. (Especially
if you are an interesting person! We become more interesting, as a parish, when
you join us!) Yes, it’s pledge time, too, for the 2013 year. Pledge to the
Cathedral in 2013, and –Hey, I also guarantee that you will be a more
interesting person!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)